Global Rounds
Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, the 2021 Global Rounds took place virtually on the custom virtual competition platform designed by Yaatly. This history making event involved more than 550 Teams from 90 countries and over 1100 volunteer judges. For more information about the decision to hold a virtual competition, please read the Official Announcement of the 2021 Jessup Global Rounds.
For the first time ever, every team participating in the Jessup Competition had the opportunity to face international opponents as they competed for the White & Case Jessup Cup. The Competition began with Exhibition and Preliminary Rounds. Then the top 168 Teams proceeded to the White & Case Advanced Rounds. From there, the top 48 Teams moved on to the Elimination Rounds. Finally, the National University of Singapore and the University of Sydney faced off in the Championship Round with the University of Sydney taking home the Jessup Cup. Additional information can be found in the Global Rounds Press Release.
Problem: The Case Concerning the J-VID18 Pandemic
Topics: The 2021 Jessup Problem concerned a global pandemic and the obligations and responses of States with response to the outbreak. It also involved questions of the jurisdiction of the Court, a claim for political asylum, and State responsibility for shooting down a civilian aircraft.
Global Rounds: 9 March - 18 April 2021
Problem Author: Peter Tzeng
Executive Director: Lesley A. Benn
2021 White & Case Jessup Cup World Championship
The 2021 World Championship took place virtually on 17 April 2021 and was live-streamed to viewers around the world. National University of Singapore (Applicant) faced University of Sydney (Respondent) in the final match of the 2021 Global Rounds.
Champion: University of Sydney (Australia)
Runner-up: National University of Singapore (Singapore)
Best Oralist in the Final Round: Bay Jia Wei
Judge Panel: H.E. Judge Tomka, H.E. Judge Xue, H.E. Judge Iwasawa
2021 Global Rounds Awards
The 2021 Global Rounds Awards Ceremony was held virtually on 18 April 2021 to recognize top Teams and Competitors as well as outstanding members of the Jessup Community. You can watch the full Ceremony in the video below. Here are the award winners:
- White & Case Distinguished Alumni Award: Brad Smith, Chief Legal Officer, Microsoft
- Pam Young Award: Andrew Holmes, David Quayat, Alissa Iwaniuk, Tessa Walker, Samantha Wilson
- Steven M. Schneebaum Award: Bhavna Bhatra (India) and Liliana Oliva Bernal & the Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (Mexico)
Global Rounds Participation & Results
- Global Rounds Participating Teams (Alphabetical by Country)
- Top 250 Teams - Preliminary Rounds Only
- Preliminary Rounds Oralists Who Argued Twice (Alphabetical)
- Top 500 Oralists – Preliminary Rounds Only (argued at least twice)
- Top 250 Memorials
- Team Rankings - Preliminary + Advanced Rounds
- Top 250 Oralists - Advanced Rounds Only (argued at least twice)
- Round of 48
- Rounds of 32
- Octofinals
- Quarterfinals
- Semifinals
Competition Materials
- Charter of the United Nations
- Statute of the International Court of Justice
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
- Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
- International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- Constitution of the World Health Organization
- 2005 International Health Regulations
- Convention on International Civil Aviation
- ILC, Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts
- ICJ, Asylum (Colombia v. Peru), Judgement (20 November 1950)
- ITLOS, Case concerning the detention of three Ukrainian naval vessels (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Provisional Measures, Order (25 May 2019)
- WTO, WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice, SPS Agreement – Article 2 (Jurisprudence)
- WTO, WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice, SPS Agreement – Article 5 (Jurisprudence)
- Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 27
- Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 36
- UN General Assembly, Question of Diplomatic Asylum: Report of the Secretary-General, UN Doc. A/10139 (September 1975) (Part I) (Part II)
- Roojin Habibi et al., “Do not violate the International Health Regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak,” The Lancet, Vol. 395, No. 10225 (2020), pp. 664-666
- Robin Geiß, “Civil Aircraft as Weapons of Large-Scale Destruction,” Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 27, No. 1 (2005), pp. 227-256
- Ali Tejpar & Steven J. Hoffman, “Canada’s Violation of International Law during the 2014–16 Ebola Outbreak,” Canadian Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 54 (2016), pp. 366-383
- Caroline Foster, “Justified Border Closures do not violate the International Health Regulations 2005”, EJIL: Talk! (11 June 2020)
- Eileen Denza, “Diplomatic Asylum,” in Andreas Zimmermann (ed.), The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol: A Commentary (2011)
- England & Wales, Court of Appeal, “B” & Others v. Secretary of State for the Foreign & Commonwealth Office, Judgment (18 October 2004), [2004] EWCA Civ 1344
- Christian Tomuschat, “Article 36,” in Andreas Zimmermann et al. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed. 2019)
- Stephan Schill & Robyn Briese, “‘If the State Considers’: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Vol. 13 (2009), pp. 61-140
- Marko Milanovic, “Mistakes of Fact When Using Lethal Force in International Law: Part I”, EJIL: Talk! (14 January 2020) (Part I) (Part II) (Part III)
- John V. Augustin, “ICAO and the Use of Force against Civil Aerial Intruders” (August 1998)
- UN Audiovisual Library